Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Timeline: ECY Bug County & House Culture


October 2015

In October of last year I brewed a simple golden base and poured that onto what remained in the carboy after I kegged my last batch of sour from my "house culture". This culture is mainly bugs from a bottle of Hill Farmstead Nordic Saison I picked up at the brewery while on vacation in Vermont last year. The beer was excellent so I built the dregs up from that bottle and have made three sours with it since.

I also brewed a Saison this month and inoculated it with a liter of  beer from this culture.

November 2015

I wrote a script that alerts me whenever love2brew has ECY Bug County or Bug Farm back in stock so I was lucky enough to get a bottle last year. I brewed the same golden base for  this beer as the previous one and pitch the Bug County.

December 2015 - February 2016

I brewed a lot of beers during this time frame and completely forgot about the two sours above. Luckily both airlocks still had vodka in them so other than a little oxygen seepage we should be good to go.

February 2016

I finally got around to transferring both golden sours to secondaries. I took gravity readings and added a medium toast oak spiral to each batch.
Bug County Pellicle

House Culture Pellicle



Left: House Culture (stirred the yeast on accident) Right: ECY Bug County

Not the best picture but both beers had reached terminal gravity by month 4, crazy.

Bug County

House Culture

April-May 2016

Our homebrew club participated in the AHA big brew day and we all brought a keg of beer to serve. I decided to taste the Saison I brewed and inoculated back in October 2015 and found it to be not very Saison like at all. It was a pretty typical sour before Brett took over in the bottle. I was disappointed it hadn't turned out the way I expected (slightly tart with all the Saison qualities) so I kegged it and served it as a sour during big brew day. It was a big hit and I went home with only about a gallon left in the corny keg.

Sour Storage :)


July 2016

I had been tasting the golden sours right along and realized they weren't changing at this point. They've been at 1.000 SG for 5 months so I decided it was time to bottle both beers in hopes that a couple months in the bottle will bring out some brett character because right now all I'm getting is lactic sourness. They are tart beers just like the Saison was but pretty one dimensional. I've heard lots of anecdotal evidence about bottling bringing out the Brett character so that's where my hopes are riding. 

Racking to bottling bucket

Mmmm beer

Bottling wand attached and ready for service

We're on our way

1 batch down, 1 to go

Both batches were shy of 5 gallons. The ECY was 4 gallons and the house culture was just under 4 gallons. Being the dumb ass that I am I still carbonated with 5oz of dextrose so I guess I'm just crossing my fingers and hoping to avoid bottle bombs and gushers but I think I'll have some problems with both.

I combined the the leftover yeast and beer from both batches for my new "house culture". I also have a packet of Bootleg Biology's Baltifunk from this year's HomebrewCon Milk the Funk bottle share.  I'll be brewing those beers very shortly. I've very sorry I missed the bottle share but I didn't have anything ready other than a Berliner so I skipped it, maybe this culture will have what I'm looking for in my sours.

I'll have one of these beers in a month and see how they're progressing and post the tasting notes. If you have any tips for me please leave them in the comments.

Monday, July 18, 2016

Homebrewing Big Beers

Our homebrew club recently used club dues to buy a 30 gallon used whiskey barrel. We talked about the purchase as a club and also the brews that would go in the barrel. We decided the first brew would be a nice big, heavy and dark beer that could handle the strong whiskey flavor that's likely to come from a freshly used barrel.

We discussed putting a second clean beer through the barrel, an option I was in favor of, but some of our more experienced members have had bad experiences trying to use a barrel more than once for cleans beers so we're going to use the barrel for sours after this initial batch. If you've had success using a barrel multiple times for clean beers I'd be interested in hearing about the experience in the comments.

Our club president loves his big, rich, club you over the head with a hammer imperial stouts so he provided the recipe for this brew. We served the same beer in Baltimore on club night at this years Homebrewcon only it wasn't barrel aged. I personally thought it was the best beer on tap but it didn't win the popular vote.

We had 4 club members get together and brew their portions together yesterday and three others who are brewing at home and bringing the beer in for transfer. All together we had 7 members at the brew session to help with handling of such a large beer which brings me to the gist of this post.

Big Beer Gotchas and Tips


Cost - Brewing a 5 gallon batch of Russian Imperial Stout can be a surprisingly expensive undertaking. Instead of 10-15 lbs of grain you're likely buying around 30 lbs of grain. Even if you make yeast starters you're likely looking at $50-$75 for all the ingredients. This beer cost $59 with the 15% discount  we get at our LHBS. That means we spent $420 to fill the 30 gallon barrel.

Equipment - You can pretty much figure on needing two of everything when you're brewing a 12% beer. 2 Yeast Starters, 2 mash tuns, 2 buckets for milled grain and two brewers ;-). The yeast starters are a must. A beer this big (1.126) needs a lot of happy yeast so you need two 1.5 liter starters. You might be able to get away with 1 mash tun if you have at least a 12 gallon tun and keep your water to grain ratio at 1 qt / 1 lb of grain. This is a pretty thick mash but it will convert. I brewed an 8.5 gallon batch this time around with a 17.5 gallon tun and at 1 qt / 1 lb grain it was overflowing when I tried to stir. Tip: with a thick mash like this I found it helps efficiency to stir every 15 minutes. 

Helpers - You probably can brew a big beer by yourself but having help makes the day much more pleasant. Lifting, mashing in, boil over watching and being able to grab a bite to eat are all good reasons to have some help. If you are brewing alone a pump is the next best option!

Efficiency - Maybe this is just me but this is my second RIS and it's the second time I came nowhere close to hitting my preboil estimate. If you normally have 72% effciency you might be able to count on 60% efficiency but 55% is more likely in my experience. The first one was way off and I needed to add 3 lbs dme to hit my numbers. This time around wasn't that bad I was only off by about 9 GU but it was still around 14% off my normal efficiency. If you don't know how to adjust your gravity based on your preboil SG measurement, byo has a good article here.

Time - A longer mash and sparge are not required but help a little with hitting your numbers. You also get the most bang for your buck if you take a second runnings and produce another beer after the Imperial. I do this with any beer over 1.070 because it really only takes an extra hour to get another 5 gallons of beer if you plan the day out.

Fermentation - Big beers bring big fermentation. This means blow off tubes, blow off tubes, blow off tubes! Don't use a standard airlock, you'll regret it.

I'm sure there's more and if I think of anything I'll do a follow up post. If you have any advice I'd love to hear it in the comments.

Monday, July 11, 2016

Belgian Dark Strong Tasting Notes


BJCP 2015 Overview Belgian Dark Strong Ale:

A dark, complex, very strong Belgian ale with a delicious blend of malt richness, dark fruit flavors, and spicy elements. Complex, rich, smooth and dangerous.

Tasting Notes 1 Month: 

I brewed this beer in March 2016. After I bottled it and it conditioned for a couple weeks I had my first taste. I wish I had documented that tasting but since I didn't I'll do my best to write a paragraph now from memory.

That early tasting was very surprising to me. It was a malty beer and sweeter than expected. The most notable flavor was a very strong fruitiness, maraschino cherry mostly, from the Abbey II yeast. I was not at all pleased with the beer at this time but I read quite a bit about Belgian Dark Strong before brewing and knew to expect the beer to become better and change quite a bit with age. 9 months seemed to be the sweet spot so that's my target, December 2016.

Belgian Dark Strong Ale Brewed March 2016

Tasting Notes 4 months

Appearance - A clear beer after sitting in the bottle for 4 months. The color is on point for the style in the dark-amber area. I like the color quite a bit. The head is off white and pours about an inch thick on the first pour.

Aroma - Not much aroma, malty and maybe a little spicy if I had to categorize it but I couldn't really put my finger on a specific aroma.

Mouthfeel - This has changed a lot from my memory of that first tasting. This was a very full bodied beer a few months ago and that's not the case right now. It actually runs the gauntlet of mouthfeel. It starts out dry on the tongue and finishes with a medium body on the back end. It's hard to explain but it's like a tingling "gassy" feel at first that ends up heavier and soothing.

Taste - The taste has changed as much as the mouthfeel. The first taste is alcohol dryness bordering on astringent but that goes away almost immediately. You then get into a light malt/maraschino cherry mixed with some dark fruit (maybe prune) like flavors. It's a very interesting taste that I think would be better of that alcohol/gassy/astringent note wasn't on the from of your tongue. I'm worried this beer is going to get worse not better. Perhaps there's too much oxygen getting in at bottle time which wouldn't surpise me. I don't have a setup where I can push my beer around with co2 so between the racking cane pushing from fermentor to bottling bucket and the bottling want and not purging bottles this may very well be the problem.

Future Changes - It's a little early to tell but I really wanted those dark fruit raisin-y, prune-y, plum-y flavors to show a strong presence in this beer. While it's a little like that I think swapping out the crystal 80 addition for special B will help. Crystal 150+Special B and maybe a different yeast will result in those flavors.

Notes

While I was somewhat hard on this beer during the 4 month tasting notes it's mostly because I had very high expectations for it. I know I can't predict the future and will give it a fair shake in another 4 months. Hopefully I'm it will surprise me and turn out fantastic.

Friday, July 8, 2016

NY Pils Hydrometer Reading and Sample Notes

This is a quick note on the Pilsner I've written in the last two posts here and here.

I used a new Fermentis yeast I haven't used before to ferment this beer Saflager S-189. I'm using my standard quick lagering method which I stole from Tasty McDole and Brulosphy and which I've found to work great. I started the beer fermenting at 53F for three days then started ramping the temp up about 4F every 12 hours until the temp hit 68F to perform a diacetyl rest and clean up any off flavors. I've found this step can take 4-6 days depending on the lager yeast and original fermentation temperature. I prefer to ferment lagers at 50F but the package said min was 53 for this yeast.

After a day of sitting at 68F I checked gravity. To my surprise the beer had already fermented completely after only 5 days. While this isn't uncommon for an ale I've had different results with lagers. Usually when I use this method the beer is about half fermented or less after 3 days. I'm not sure if this is a result of fermenting a few degrees higher than I normally would or if its the S-189 yeast. I guess I'll have to brew with this yeast a few more times and try my standard German lager yeast at 54 to find out.




I also tasted the samples at this point expecting diacetyl and maybe sulfur but I had another surprise. The beer was as clean as could be already. I had my wife double check this and she couldn't find any off flavors either. I plan on double checking this tonight and if it's still clean I'll be crashing to 32 for 7 days then packaging.

There are a couple other things that surprised me with this beer. On is that the grain bill is about 25% Munich but it was not overly caramel-y or biscuit-y. It was very smooth without any flavor smacking you in the face, nice for a Pilsner. The other is that even though I had a lot of late hop additions in this beer the hops are barely noticeable. The beer is balanced but not hoppy. In fact I'm consider dry hopping it just to get some more hop presence in the beer.

I guess this is making a good point for trying new things like dumping Munich into a Pilsner and using a yeasts you haven't used before. It's all about data collection and experience :). I'll post tasting notes in a couple of weeks.

On another note the hops are coming along. Cascade, Mt. Hood, Chinook, Liberty, Perle, Centennial.








Cheers!

Friday, July 1, 2016

NY Pils, I mean Munich Pils?, Brew day

I fucked up.

I didn't check how much malt I had on hand before I started to brew the NY Pils today and it bit me in the ass. I only had 13 pounds left in a 50 lb sack of Pilsen malt. I had Munich, Vienna, Marris Otter and Wheat on had. What to do what to do. So I tossed in 5lbs of Munich malt.

So now 25% of my grain bill is Munich in what's supposed to be a Pilsner. What kind of beer do I have now? A good fried suggested it's a Munich Helles, the problem with that is how hoppy this beer is. It's 100% cascade hops, those are going to come through so I'm thinking Helles is out.

It's darker that it should be now, more like a Maibock which may very well be the closest thing this beer will come to resemble, I'm not quite sure.

Anyways the rest of the brew day went flawlessly. I hit all my numbers and had all the rest of the ingredients so there's nothing left to do but see how this beer tastes.



Double Infusion Mash, BeerSmith did not let me down.

You can see how dark this beer is.
It started raining so I had to move things indoors.